Quick answers
- Is CVE-2026-63578 exploited in the wild?
- No. Junglewise Threat Intelligence has no report of CVE-2026-63578 being exploited in the wild.
- How severe is CVE-2026-63578?
- Informational severity, published 2 October 2026.
- Which products and versions are affected?
- Legion of the Bouncy Castle BouncyCastle.Cryptography before 2.7.0.
- Is there a fix for CVE-2026-63578?
- Yes: fixed in BouncyCastle.Cryptography 2.7.0. Junglewise finds every place you run it, drafts the upgrade and applies it once you approve.
- How is CVE-2026-63578 attacked?
- It is attacked over the network, in a software library.
- Am I affected by CVE-2026-63578?
- Check whether you run Legion of the Bouncy Castle BouncyCastle.Cryptography at an affected version. Junglewise does that check for you around the clock: connect your code, cloud and domains, and it matches new vulnerabilities like this one against what you actually run and tells you when one reaches you.
How to fix
- Fixed in: BouncyCastle.Cryptography 2.7.0
Technical details
The vulnerability exists in PbeUtilities.GenerateCipherParameters and related password-based encryption (PBES1, PBES2/PBKDF2, PKCS#12 PBE, and CMS password recipients) functions, which fail to validate the iteration count parameter before performing key derivation. An attacker supplying an encrypted private key with an iteration count close to 2^31 can trigger CPU exhaustion. The key derivation computation occurs before any password or data validation, making the attack trivial to execute.
Affected products
- Legion of the Bouncy Castle BouncyCastle.Cryptography before 2.7.0
Timeline
- 2026-10-02: disclosed