Quick answers
- Is CVE-2026-63576 exploited in the wild?
- No. Junglewise Threat Intelligence has no report of CVE-2026-63576 being exploited in the wild.
- How severe is CVE-2026-63576?
- Informational severity, published 2 October 2026.
- Which products and versions are affected?
- Legion of the Bouncy Castle BouncyCastle.Cryptography before 2.7.0.
- Is there a fix for CVE-2026-63576?
- Yes: fixed in BouncyCastle.Cryptography 2.7.0. Junglewise finds every place you run it, drafts the upgrade and applies it once you approve.
- How is CVE-2026-63576 attacked?
- It is attacked over the network, in a software library.
- Am I affected by CVE-2026-63576?
- Check whether you run Legion of the Bouncy Castle BouncyCastle.Cryptography at an affected version. Junglewise does that check for you around the clock: connect your code, cloud and domains, and it matches new vulnerabilities like this one against what you actually run and tells you when one reaches you.
How to fix
- Fixed in: BouncyCastle.Cryptography 2.7.0
Technical details
The PkixNameConstraintValidator's ExtractHostFromURL function improperly parses URIs by using string slicing without first isolating the RFC 3986 authority component, allowing characters like '@' or ':' in the URI's path, query, fragment, or userinfo to cause the extracted hostname to differ from the actual host. This enables bypassing of uniformResourceIdentifier name constraints during certification path validation. A name-constrained subordinate CA can obtain certificates with crafted subjectAltName URIs to exploit this parsing flaw.
Affected products
- Legion of the Bouncy Castle BouncyCastle.Cryptography before 2.7.0
Timeline
- 2026-07-02: patched
- 2026-10-02: advisory