Quick answers
- Is CVE-1999-1266 exploited in the wild?
- No. Junglewise Threat Intelligence has no report of CVE-1999-1266 being exploited in the wild.
- How severe is CVE-1999-1266?
- Medium severity, with a CVSS score of 5, published 13 June 1997.
- Which products and versions are affected?
- unknown rshd (rsh daemon).
- Is there a fix for CVE-1999-1266?
- No fixed version is recorded yet. Check the vendor's advisory in the references below. If you run it, Junglewise drafts a mitigation that fits your setup and applies it once you approve, with senior security engineers behind it.
- How is CVE-1999-1266 attacked?
- It is attacked over the network, in an operating system.
- Am I affected by CVE-1999-1266?
- Check whether you run Metamail Corporation Metamail or Rshd. Junglewise does that check for you around the clock: connect your code, cloud and domains, and it matches new vulnerabilities like this one against what you actually run and tells you when one reaches you.
Technical details
The rsh daemon (rshd) is vulnerable to information disclosure via an observable response discrepancy (user enumeration). When a remote user attempts to connect, the daemon returns distinct error messages depending on whether the provided username exists on the local system. This is a network-based attack that requires no prior authentication. An attacker can automate requests to the service to brute-force or 'harvest' valid account names, significantly reducing the effort required for subsequent credential-based attacks. This behavior is inherent to older implementations of the rsh protocol.
Affected products
- unknown rshd (rsh daemon)
Timeline
- 1997-06-13: disclosed