Quick answers
- Is CVE-2026-98093 exploited in the wild?
- No. Junglewise Threat Intelligence has no report of CVE-2026-98093 being exploited in the wild.
- How severe is CVE-2026-98093?
- Informational severity, published 25 September 2026.
- Which products and versions are affected?
- Unknown Linux kernel Multiple kernel versions (likely 5.x and 6.x series based on git log).
- Is there a fix for CVE-2026-98093?
- A patch was published on 2026-09-01: Fix committed upstream by Mark Brown Junglewise finds every place you run it, drafts the upgrade and applies it once you approve.
- How is CVE-2026-98093 attacked?
- It is attacked with local access, in an operating system.
- Am I affected by CVE-2026-98093?
- Check whether you run Unknown Linux kernel at an affected version. Junglewise does that check for you around the clock: connect your code, cloud and domains, and it matches new vulnerabilities like this one against what you actually run and tells you when one reaches you.
Technical details
The hw_params() callback unconditionally enables the mclk (master clock) and hw_free() unconditionally disables it, but the PCM core does not guarantee 1:1 pairing: hw_free() may execute without hw_params(), and hw_params() can be called multiple times from SETUP state. This causes a spurious "already disabled" warning and leaks enable references, leaving the clock ungateable. The fix guards both operations with an existing mclk_flag boolean to track actual enable state.
Affected products
- <UNKNOWN> Linux kernel Multiple kernel versions (likely 5.x and 6.x series based on git log)
Timeline
- 2026-09-25: disclosed: Published in NVD
- 2026-09-01: patched: Fix committed upstream by Mark Brown
- 2026-09-21: patched: Fix included in stable kernel release