Quick answers
- Is CVE-2026-81715 exploited in the wild?
- No. Junglewise Threat Intelligence has no report of CVE-2026-81715 being exploited in the wild.
- How severe is CVE-2026-81715?
- Medium severity, with a CVSS score of 4, published 27 August 2026.
- Which products and versions are affected?
- Jahlives Openssl Encrypt <=1.4.8; openssl-encrypt (PyPI) ECOSYSTEM:introduced=0,fixed=1.4.9.
- Is there a fix for CVE-2026-81715?
- Yes. openssl-encrypt (PyPI): upgrade to 1.4.9 or later. Junglewise finds every place you run it, drafts the upgrade and applies it once you approve.
- How is CVE-2026-81715 attacked?
- It is attacked with local access.
- Am I affected by CVE-2026-81715?
- Check whether you run Jahlives Openssl Encrypt or openssl-encrypt (PyPI) at an affected version. Junglewise does that check for you around the clock: connect your code, cloud and domains, and it matches new vulnerabilities like this one against what you actually run and tells you when one reaches you.
How to fix
- openssl-encrypt (PyPI): upgrade to 1.4.9 or later
pip install "openssl-encrypt>=1.4.9"
Technical details
The vulnerability is an information disclosure (CWE-532) caused by insufficient sanitization of debug output. The `sanitize_argv_for_debug` function fails to redact the keyserver bearer token passed as a positional argument to the `keyserver set-token` command. As a result, when the application runs with the `--debug` flag, the token is printed in cleartext to stderr even without `--unsafe-show-secrets` being specified. This persists credentials in shell history and log files. The vulnerability affects versions <= 1.4.8 and was fixed in version 1.4.9 by routing the positional token through the debug_secret redaction mechanism.
Affected products
- jahlives openssl-encrypt <=1.4.8
Identifiers
- CVE-2026-81715
- PYSEC-2026-3964
Timeline
- 2026-08-12: disclosed
- 2026-08-27: patched: Version 1.4.9 released with fix