Quick answers
- Is CVE-2026-71883 exploited in the wild?
- No. Junglewise Threat Intelligence has no report of CVE-2026-71883 being exploited in the wild.
- How severe is CVE-2026-71883?
- Informational severity, published 3 October 2026.
- Which products and versions are affected?
- Bouncycastle Bouncy Castle For Java Lts before 2.73.13 (affected from 2.73.4).
- Is there a fix for CVE-2026-71883?
- Yes: fixed in Bouncy Castle for Java LTS 2.73.13. Junglewise finds every place you run it, drafts the upgrade and applies it once you approve.
- How is CVE-2026-71883 attacked?
- It is attacked with local access, in a software library.
- Am I affected by CVE-2026-71883?
- Check whether you run Bouncycastle Bouncy Castle For Java Lts at an affected version. Junglewise does that check for you around the clock: connect your code, cloud and domains, and it matches new vulnerabilities like this one against what you actually run and tells you when one reaches you.
How to fix
- Fixed in: Bouncy Castle for Java LTS 2.73.13
Technical details
The native packet ciphers for AES-CBC, CCM, CFB, CTR, GCM and GCM-SIV in Bouncy Castle Java LTS (versions 2.73.4 through 2.73.12) use JNI to perform encryption but incorrectly release input arrays (including keys and IVs) in read-write mode, allowing stale copies to overwrite the output buffer. When an application passes the same Java array as both input and output—such as encrypting directly into a KeyParameter.getKey() array—the output buffer is committed first, then the unchanged key bytes are committed over the ciphertext. The pure-Java implementations and streaming native modes are unaffected, as are regular Bouncy Castle distributions without native code.
Affected products
- Bouncycastle Bouncy Castle for Java LTS before 2.73.13 (affected from 2.73.4)
Timeline
- 2026-10-03: disclosed