Quick answers
- Is CVE-2026-69247 exploited in the wild?
- No. Junglewise Threat Intelligence has no report of CVE-2026-69247 being exploited in the wild.
- How severe is CVE-2026-69247?
- High severity, with a CVSS score of 4, published 3 August 2026.
- Which products and versions are affected?
- cryptography (PyPI) >= 44.0.0, < 50.0.0, ECOSYSTEM:introduced=44.0.0,fixed=50.0.0.
- Is there a fix for CVE-2026-69247?
- Yes. cryptography (PyPI): upgrade to 50.0.0 or later. Junglewise finds every place you run it, drafts the upgrade and applies it once you approve.
- How is CVE-2026-69247 attacked?
- It is attacked over the network, in a software library.
- Am I affected by CVE-2026-69247?
- Check whether you run cryptography (PyPI) at an affected version. Junglewise does that check for you around the clock: connect your code, cloud and domains, and it matches new vulnerabilities like this one against what you actually run and tells you when one reaches you.
How to fix
- cryptography (PyPI): upgrade to 50.0.0 or later
pip install "cryptography>=50.0.0"
Technical details
The functions pkcs7_decrypt_der, pkcs7_decrypt_pem, and pkcs7_decrypt_smime fail to implement RFC 3218 mitigations, leading to a Bleichenbacher oracle. The implementation leaks information through distinguishable error messages and timing differences during the RSA PKCS#1 v1.5 decryption of the 'encryptedKey' field. Specifically, the library distinguishes between invalid RSA padding, incorrect key lengths, and padding errors in the subsequent AES-CBC decryption. This allows a remote attacker to perform a chosen-ciphertext attack to recover the content-encryption key. The vulnerability is fixed in version 50.0.0 by ensuring all decryption paths perform identical work and return uniform error responses.
Affected products
- pyca cryptography >= 44.0.0, < 50.0.0
Identifiers
- CVE-2026-69247
- GHSA-g6cj-pr64-35w5
- PYSEC-2026-3552
Timeline
- 2026-07-31: disclosed
- 2026-08-03: advisory
- 2026-08-03: patched