Quick answers
- Is CVE-2026-67219 exploited in the wild?
- No. Junglewise Threat Intelligence has no report of CVE-2026-67219 being exploited in the wild.
- How severe is CVE-2026-67219?
- Informational severity, published 23 September 2026.
- Which products and versions are affected?
- VMware RabbitMQ 3.13.0 to 3.13.14, 4.0.0 to 4.0.19, 4.1.0 to 4.1.10, 4.2.0 to 4.2.5.
- Is there a fix for CVE-2026-67219?
- A patch was published on 2026-04-23: Fixed in RabbitMQ 3.13.15, 4.0.20, 4.1.11, 4.2.6, and 4.3.0 Junglewise finds every place you run it, drafts the upgrade and applies it once you approve.
- How is CVE-2026-67219 attacked?
- It is attacked over the network, in a hosted service.
- Am I affected by CVE-2026-67219?
- Check whether you run VMware RabbitMQ at an affected version. Junglewise does that check for you around the clock: connect your code, cloud and domains, and it matches new vulnerabilities like this one against what you actually run and tells you when one reaches you.
Technical details
The add_binding/3 function in RabbitMQ's consistent-hash exchange plugin parses the routing key as an integer weight N and uses lists:seq(NextN0, NextN0 + N - 1) to allocate a list, but validate_binding/2 only enforces N >= 1 with no upper bound. An authenticated attacker with write permission on a consistent-hash exchange and read access to a queue can supply an extremely large N value; this list is persisted to Khepri and replicated cluster-wide, consuming ~800 MB per node for a weight of 100,000,000 and persisting across restarts.
Affected products
- VMware RabbitMQ 3.13.0 to 3.13.14, 4.0.0 to 4.0.19, 4.1.0 to 4.1.10, 4.2.0 to 4.2.5
Timeline
- 2026-09-23: disclosed: CVE-2026-67219 published
- 2026-04-23: patched: Fixed in RabbitMQ 3.13.15, 4.0.20, 4.1.11, 4.2.6, and 4.3.0