Quick answers
- Is CVE-2026-65628 exploited in the wild?
- No. Junglewise Threat Intelligence has no report of CVE-2026-65628 being exploited in the wild.
- How severe is CVE-2026-65628?
- Informational severity, published 26 October 2026.
- Which products and versions are affected?
- Erlang Jose 1.5.0 to 1.11.12.
- Is there a fix for CVE-2026-65628?
- Yes: fixed in 1.11.13. Until then: Applications should validate that peer-supplied JWKs have matching key types and elliptic curve parameters before invoking shared_secret/2, either by explicit type checking or by rejecting keys that differ from the expected algorithm.</anigation> </invoke> Junglewise finds every place you run it, drafts the upgrade and applies it once you approve.
- How is CVE-2026-65628 attacked?
- It is attacked over the network, in a software library.
- Am I affected by CVE-2026-65628?
- Check whether you run Erlang Jose at an affected version. Junglewise does that check for you around the clock: connect your code, cloud and domains, and it matches new vulnerabilities like this one against what you actually run and tells you when one reaches you.
How to fix
- Fixed in: 1.11.13
Applications should validate that peer-supplied JWKs have matching key types and elliptic curve parameters before invoking shared_secret/2, either by explicit type checking or by rejecting keys that differ from the expected algorithm.</anigation> </invoke>
Technical details
The shared_secret/2 function in jose_jwk fails to validate that both input JWKs have matching key types before attempting derivation. When key types differ, the fallback clause recursively reinvokes itself with identical arguments, creating an unbounded tail-recursive loop. An attacker-controlled peer public key of a different type (e.g., RSA instead of EC) triggers the loop, consuming CPU resources without recovery or exception.
Affected products
- Erlang jose 1.5.0 to 1.11.12
Timeline
- 2026-10-26: disclosed
- 2026-10-26: advisory