Quick answers
- Is CVE-2026-63349 exploited in the wild?
- No. Junglewise Threat Intelligence has no report of CVE-2026-63349 being exploited in the wild.
- How severe is CVE-2026-63349?
- High severity, with a CVSS score of 4, published 18 September 2026.
- Which products and versions are affected?
- anyio (PyPI) >= 4.14.0, < 4.14.2, ECOSYSTEM:introduced=4.14.0,fixed=4.14.2.
- Is there a fix for CVE-2026-63349?
- Yes. anyio (PyPI): upgrade to 4.14.2 or later. Junglewise finds every place you run it, drafts the upgrade and applies it once you approve.
- How is CVE-2026-63349 attacked?
- It is attacked with local access, in a software library.
- Am I affected by CVE-2026-63349?
- Check whether you run anyio (PyPI) at an affected version. Junglewise does that check for you around the clock: connect your code, cloud and domains, and it matches new vulnerabilities like this one against what you actually run and tells you when one reaches you.
How to fix
- anyio (PyPI): upgrade to 4.14.2 or later
pip install "anyio>=4.14.2"
Technical details
The vulnerability is a privilege management bug in AnyIO's open_process() function. When the extra_groups parameter is provided to set or clear supplementary groups, the function incorrectly assigns kwargs["extra_groups"] = group instead of kwargs["extra_groups"] = extra_groups, passing the wrong variable to the backend. This causes child processes to retain the parent's supplementary group memberships instead of having them modified as requested. If both group and extra_groups are supplied, an integer is passed where a list is expected, resulting in TypeError. This is a POSIX-specific correctness issue affecting privilege-dropping scenarios. The bug affects versions 4.14.0 through 4.14.1 and is patched in version 4.14.2.
Affected products
- Alex Gronholm AnyIO 4.14.0 to 4.14.1
Identifiers
- CVE-2026-63349
- GHSA-3w57-8xmc-8v26
- PYSEC-2026-4023
Timeline
- 2026-07-07: disclosed
- 2026-09-18: patched: Version 4.14.2 released