Quick answers
- Is CVE-2026-6092 exploited in the wild?
- No. Junglewise Threat Intelligence has no report of CVE-2026-6092 being exploited in the wild.
- How severe is CVE-2026-6092?
- Informational severity, with a CVSS score of 2.1, published 25 June 2026.
- Which products and versions are affected?
- Wolfssl 5.2.0 through 5.9.1.
- Is there a fix for CVE-2026-6092?
- A patch was published on 2026-04-09: Fix merged into wolfSSL master branch via PR 10167 Junglewise finds every place you run it, drafts the upgrade and applies it once you approve.
- How is CVE-2026-6092 attacked?
- It is attacked over the network or from the adjacent network, in a software library.
- Am I affected by CVE-2026-6092?
- Check whether you run Wolfssl at an affected version. Junglewise does that check for you around the clock: connect your code, cloud and domains, and it matches new vulnerabilities like this one against what you actually run and tells you when one reaches you.
Technical details
A vulnerability exists in wolfSSL versions 5.2.0 through 5.9.1 where the TLS 1.2 implementation fails to enforce the Encrypt-then-MAC (EtM) extension during specific handshake paths. Specifically, if a server initially attempts to resume a session but the resumption lookup fails (e.g., due to a stale session ID), the logic in DoClientHello may silently disable EtM and fall back to the older MAC-then-Encrypt (MtE) mechanism. This is classified as a 'Selection of Less-Secure Algorithm During Negotiation' (CWE-757). An attacker with adjacent network access and specific preconditions could potentially exploit this downgrade, though the impact is limited to a loss of cryptographic strength. The issue is fixed in wolfSSL version 5.9.1.
Affected products
- wolfSSL wolfSSL 5.2.0 through 5.9.1
Timeline
- 2026-04-09: patched: Fix merged into wolfSSL master branch via PR 10167
- 2026-06-25: disclosed: CVE-2026-6092 published