Quick answers
- Is CVE-2026-48057 exploited in the wild?
- No. Junglewise Threat Intelligence has no report of CVE-2026-48057 being exploited in the wild.
- How severe is CVE-2026-48057?
- Informational severity, published 6 November 2026.
- Which products and versions are affected?
- Botan prior to 3.13.0.
- Is there a fix for CVE-2026-48057?
- Yes: fixed in 3.13.0. Junglewise finds every place you run it, drafts the upgrade and applies it once you approve.
- How is CVE-2026-48057 attacked?
- It is attacked over the network, in a software library.
- Am I affected by CVE-2026-48057?
- Check whether you run Botan at an affected version. Junglewise does that check for you around the clock: connect your code, cloud and domains, and it matches new vulnerabilities like this one against what you actually run and tells you when one reaches you.
How to fix
- Fixed in: 3.13.0
Technical details
The X.509 Distinguished Name decoder in Botan prior to 3.13.0 flattens multi-value Relative Distinguished Names (RDNs), losing the internal grouping structure before name-constraint validation. An attacker controlling a name-constrained intermediate CA can craft a certificate with a multi-value RDN where the first CN matches the permitted constraint; the constraint check operates on the flattened structure and accepts only the first value, but the second CN can then be used for hostname matching when no subjectAlternativeName is present. The fix preserves RDN grouping during decoding and updates constraint matching to use set-equality comparison within each RDN per RFC 5280.
Affected products
- Botan Botan prior to 3.13.0
Timeline
- 2026-11-06: disclosed
- 2026-05-22: patched