Quick answers
- Is CVE-2026-44519 exploited in the wild?
- No. Junglewise Threat Intelligence has no report of CVE-2026-44519 being exploited in the wild.
- How severe is CVE-2026-44519?
- Medium severity, with a CVSS score of 5.1, published 6 November 2026.
- Which products and versions are affected?
- Open Quantum Safe Liboqs before 0.16.0.
- Is there a fix for CVE-2026-44519?
- Yes: fixed in 0.16.0. Junglewise finds every place you run it, drafts the upgrade and applies it once you approve.
- How is CVE-2026-44519 attacked?
- It is attacked with local access, in a software library.
- Am I affected by CVE-2026-44519?
- Check whether you run Open Quantum Safe Liboqs at an affected version. Junglewise does that check for you around the clock: connect your code, cloud and domains, and it matches new vulnerabilities like this one against what you actually run and tells you when one reaches you.
How to fix
- Fixed in: 0.16.0
Technical details
The ct_select function in src/kem/frodokem/external/util.c lacks a value barrier in the Fujisaki-Okamoto rejection sampling path, allowing Clang 17+ to emit a secret-dependent conditional load at optimization levels like -Os. This creates observable cache residency differences between successful and failed decapsulation paths, exploitable via cache-timing side-channel attacks. The issue is fixed by adding an OQS_MEM_BLACK_BOX optimization barrier to prevent compiler optimization that would expose the secret-dependent branch.
Affected products
- Open Quantum Safe liboqs before 0.16.0
Timeline
- 2026-11-06: disclosed