Quick answers
- Is CVE-2026-40094 exploited in the wild?
- No. Junglewise Threat Intelligence has no report of CVE-2026-40094 being exploited in the wild.
- How severe is CVE-2026-40094?
- Medium severity, with a CVSS score of 4.3, published 20 May 2026.
- Which products and versions are affected?
- Nimiq nimiq-network-libp2p <= 1.3.0.
- Is there a fix for CVE-2026-40094?
- A patch was published on 2026-04-22: Fix merged in pull request #3715 and released in v1.4.0 Junglewise finds every place you run it, drafts the upgrade and applies it once you approve.
- How is CVE-2026-40094 attacked?
- It is attacked over the network, in a software library.
- Am I affected by CVE-2026-40094?
- Check whether you run Nimiq Network Libp2p. Junglewise does that check for you around the clock: connect your code, cloud and domains, and it matches new vulnerabilities like this one against what you actually run and tells you when one reaches you.
Technical details
A denial-of-service vulnerability exists in the network-libp2p discovery component of the Nimiq Rust implementation. The PeerContact structure lacks intrinsic validation to ensure the addresses list is non-empty, allowing signed updates from untrusted peers with empty address arrays to be stored in the PeerContactBook. When PeerContactBook::known_peers is subsequently called—typically via an RPC or web client request to get_address_book—the code attempts to access the first element of the address list using .expect(), triggering a Rust panic. Depending on the node's panic settings, this results in a crash of the specific RPC task or the entire node. The issue is fixed in version 1.4.0 by skipping peers with empty address lists during address book construction.
Affected products
- Nimiq nimiq-network-libp2p <= 1.3.0
Timeline
- 2026-04-22: patched: Fix merged in pull request #3715 and released in v1.4.0
- 2026-05-15: advisory: GitHub Security Advisory GHSA-c45m-6x25-3cjq published
- 2026-05-20: disclosed: CVE-2026-40094 published