Quick answers
- Is CVE-2026-34933 exploited in the wild?
- No. Junglewise Threat Intelligence has no report of CVE-2026-34933 being exploited in the wild.
- How severe is CVE-2026-34933?
- Medium severity, with a CVSS score of 5.5, published 3 April 2026.
- Which products and versions are affected?
- Avahi <= 0.8, 0.9-rc1, 0.9-rc2, 0.9-rc3.
- Is there a fix for CVE-2026-34933?
- A patch was published on 2026-04-01: Fix merged in GitHub pull request #891 Junglewise finds every place you run it, drafts the upgrade and applies it once you approve.
- How is CVE-2026-34933 attacked?
- It is attacked with local access, in an operating system.
- Am I affected by CVE-2026-34933?
- Check whether you run Avahi at an affected version. Junglewise does that check for you around the clock: connect your code, cloud and domains, and it matches new vulnerabilities like this one against what you actually run and tells you when one reaches you.
Technical details
A reachable assertion exists in the transport_flags_from_domain() function within Avahi's entry.c. The vulnerability is triggered when an unprivileged local user invokes D-Bus methods (such as AddService or AddRecord) on the org.freedesktop.Avahi.EntryGroup interface while passing both the AVAHI_PUBLISH_USE_MULTICAST (0x100) and AVAHI_PUBLISH_USE_WIDE_AREA (0x80) flags simultaneously. While the initial validation macro (AVAHI_FLAGS_VALID) permits both bits, the underlying transport function uses an assert() to enforce their mutual exclusivity. This results in a SIGABRT and daemon crash. The issue is fixed in version 0.9-rc4 by explicitly refusing requests containing both flags.
Affected products
- Avahi Avahi <= 0.8, 0.9-rc1, 0.9-rc2, 0.9-rc3
Timeline
- 2026-03-10: disclosed: Vulnerability discovered by Orange Cyberdefense
- 2026-04-01: patched: Fix merged in GitHub pull request #891
- 2026-04-01: advisory: GitHub Security Advisory GHSA-w65r-6gxh-vhvc published
- 2026-04-03: advisory: CVE-2026-34933 published to NVD