Quick answers
- Is CVE-2026-19938 exploited in the wild?
- No. Junglewise Threat Intelligence has no report of CVE-2026-19938 being exploited in the wild.
- How severe is CVE-2026-19938?
- Medium severity, with a CVSS score of 5.9, published 13 October 2026.
- Which products and versions are affected?
- Zephyr RTOS versions with CONFIG_BT_SIGNING enabled.
- Is there a fix for CVE-2026-19938?
- No fixed version is recorded yet. Disable CONFIG_BT_SIGNING if signed writes are not required, or restrict pairing to peers that accept and negotiate CSRK (signing key) distribution.</anigation> </invoke> If you run it, Junglewise drafts a mitigation that fits your setup and applies it once you approve, with senior security engineers behind it.
- How is CVE-2026-19938 attacked?
- It is attacked from the adjacent network, in an operating system.
- Am I affected by CVE-2026-19938?
- Check whether you run Zephyr RTOS at an affected version. Junglewise does that check for you around the clock: connect your code, cloud and domains, and it matches new vulnerabilities like this one against what you actually run and tells you when one reaches you.
How to fix
Disable CONFIG_BT_SIGNING if signed writes are not required, or restrict pairing to peers that accept and negotiate CSRK (signing key) distribution.</anigation> </invoke>
Technical details
The vulnerability is a use-after-free in chan_send() within subsys/bluetooth/host/att.c when BT_ATT_OP_SIGNED_WRITE_CMD fails signing via bt_smp_sign(). The function incorrectly calls net_buf_unref() on error instead of retaining caller ownership, violating the documented contract. Callers expect to own the buffer on failure and attempt to re-queue or retry it, leading to list corruption, double-free, and out-of-bounds writes when buffers are reissued or retried.
Affected products
- Zephyr RTOS versions with CONFIG_BT_SIGNING enabled
Timeline
- 2026-10-13: disclosed