Quick answers
- Is CVE-2026-116774 exploited in the wild?
- No. Junglewise Threat Intelligence has no report of CVE-2026-116774 being exploited in the wild.
- How severe is CVE-2026-116774?
- Medium severity, with a CVSS score of 4.3, published 27 October 2026.
- Which products and versions are affected?
- russh (crates.io) >= 0.60.0, <= 0.64.1, ECOSYSTEM:introduced=0.60.0,fixed=0.65; Russh 0.60.0 to 0.64.x.
- Is there a fix for CVE-2026-116774?
- Yes. russh (crates.io): upgrade to 0.65 or later. Junglewise finds every place you run it, drafts the upgrade and applies it once you approve.
- How is CVE-2026-116774 attacked?
- It is attacked over the network.
- Am I affected by CVE-2026-116774?
- Check whether you run russh (crates.io) or Russh at an affected version. Junglewise does that check for you around the clock: connect your code, cloud and domains, and it matches new vulnerabilities like this one against what you actually run and tells you when one reaches you.
How to fix
- russh (crates.io): upgrade to 0.65 or later
cargo update -p russh
Technical details
The vulnerability exists in channel-open packet parsing (versions 0.60.0 to 0.64.x) where a peer-declared maximum_packet_size of zero is accepted and passed to ChannelTx::poll_writable. The asynchronous write paths (Channel::data, Channel::make_writer, Channel::into_stream) calculate a writable size of zero and remain pending forever because window adjustments cannot satisfy a static zero packet maximum. The fix in 0.65.0 rejects zero-valued maximum_packet_size parameters at the protocol parsing stage.
Affected products
- russh russh 0.60.0 to 0.64.x
Identifiers
- CVE-2026-116774
- GHSA-fw5c-8223-6h42
Timeline
- 2026-10-27: disclosed
- 2026-10-25: patched: Version 0.65.0 released