Quick answers
- Is CVE-2026-114054 exploited in the wild?
- No. Junglewise Threat Intelligence has no report of CVE-2026-114054 being exploited in the wild.
- How severe is CVE-2026-114054?
- Medium severity, with a CVSS score of 6.5, published 21 October 2026.
- Which products and versions are affected?
- vllm (PyPI) ECOSYSTEM:introduced=0,fixed=0.31.0; vLLM Project vllm before 0.31.0.
- Is there a fix for CVE-2026-114054?
- Yes. vllm (PyPI): upgrade to 0.31.0 or later. Junglewise finds every place you run it, drafts the upgrade and applies it once you approve.
- How is CVE-2026-114054 attacked?
- It is attacked over the network, in a software library.
- Am I affected by CVE-2026-114054?
- Check whether you run vllm (PyPI) or vLLM Project vllm at an affected version. Junglewise does that check for you around the clock: connect your code, cloud and domains, and it matches new vulnerabilities like this one against what you actually run and tells you when one reaches you.
How to fix
- vllm (PyPI): upgrade to 0.31.0 or later
pip install "vllm>=0.31.0"
Technical details
The vulnerability stems from deriving shared cache keys from caller-controlled values without proper binding to request principals or content. Site A exploits EXIF ImageID in multimodal hashing: when an image carries a UUID ImageID, that value alone becomes the cache key, allowing different images with identical UUIDs to alias. Site B affects prefix-cache block hashing via untyped key concatenation: LoRA names and cache_salt values are flattened without type tagging, so a request with LoRA="foo" and another with cache_salt="foo" produce identical first-block cache hashes, enabling KV state reuse across security domains. Both attack vectors require authentication and network access.
Affected products
- vLLM Project vLLM before 0.31.0
Identifiers
- CVE-2026-114054
- GHSA-rh6f-3x46-j33q
- PYSEC-2026-4362
Timeline
- 2026-10-06: disclosed
- 2026-10-21: advisory