Quick answers
- Is CVE-2026-103503 exploited in the wild?
- No. Junglewise Threat Intelligence has no report of CVE-2026-103503 being exploited in the wild.
- How severe is CVE-2026-103503?
- Informational severity, published 12 October 2026.
- Which products and versions are affected?
- Hexpm Hex from 0.20.2 before 2.5.2.
- Is there a fix for CVE-2026-103503?
- Yes: fixed in 2.5.2. Junglewise finds every place you run it, drafts the upgrade and applies it once you approve.
- How is CVE-2026-103503 attacked?
- It is attacked over the network, in a software library.
- Am I affected by CVE-2026-103503?
- Check whether you run Hexpm Hex at an affected version. Junglewise does that check for you around the clock: connect your code, cloud and domains, and it matches new vulnerabilities like this one against what you actually run and tells you when one reaches you.
How to fix
- Fixed in: 2.5.2
Technical details
The vulnerability exists in Hex.HTTP.SSL where the partial_chain callback is built from the bundled CA store even when cacerts_path is configured to use a different CA store. This allows a certificate chain to be validated if any certificate in it matches a public key in the bundled store, bypassing the user's custom CA restrictions. An attacker holding a certificate for a Hex host issued by any CA in Hex's bundled store can impersonate that host to users who set cacerts_path to exclude that CA. Hostname verification still applies, so the attacker must hold a valid certificate for the target host.
Affected products
- hexpm hex from 0.20.2 before 2.5.2
Timeline
- 2026-10-12: disclosed