Quick answers
- Is CVE-2026-102999 exploited in the wild?
- No. Junglewise Threat Intelligence has no report of CVE-2026-102999 being exploited in the wild.
- How severe is CVE-2026-102999?
- High severity, with a CVSS score of 4, published 30 September 2026.
- Which products and versions are affected?
- Py-Pdf Pypdf before 6.19.0; pypdf (PyPI) < 6.19.0, ECOSYSTEM:introduced=0,fixed=6.19.0.
- Is there a fix for CVE-2026-102999?
- Yes. pypdf (PyPI): upgrade to 6.19.0 or later. Junglewise finds every place you run it, drafts the upgrade and applies it once you approve.
- How is CVE-2026-102999 attacked?
- It is attacked over the network, in a software library.
- Am I affected by CVE-2026-102999?
- Check whether you run Py-Pdf Pypdf or pypdf (PyPI) at an affected version. Junglewise does that check for you around the clock: connect your code, cloud and domains, and it matches new vulnerabilities like this one against what you actually run and tells you when one reaches you.
How to fix
- pypdf (PyPI): upgrade to 6.19.0 or later
pip install "pypdf>=6.19.0"
Technical details
The vulnerability is an algorithmic inefficiency (ReDoS-like pattern) in the attachment mapping API in pypdf/_doc_common.py. Prior to version 6.19.0, each content lookup when iterating over attachments using .items() triggered a full reparse of the attachment list, resulting in O(n²) complexity for n attachments. An attacker can craft a PDF with many embedded files to trigger long runtimes. The fix caches attachment file objects per name for direct stream access.
Affected products
- py-pdf pypdf before 6.19.0
Identifiers
- CVE-2026-102999
- GHSA-v247-6f48-mgcj
- PYSEC-2026-4159
Timeline
- 2026-09-30: disclosed
- 2026-09-14: patched