# CVE-2024-32648: vyper default functions don't respect nonreentrancy keys

Source: https://junglewise.ai/threats/cve-2024-32648-vyper-default-functions-don-t-respect-nonreentrancy-keys  
Publisher: Junglewise Threat Intelligence, https://junglewise.ai/threats  
Published: 2024-04-25  
License: CC BY 4.0 with a link back

CVE-2024-32648 · Severity: low · CVSS 3.1 · Published 2024-04-25

Vyper is a pythonic Smart Contract Language for the Ethereum virtual machine. Prior to version 0.3.0, default functions don't respect nonreentrancy keys and the lock isn't emitted. No vulnerable production contracts were found. Additionally, using a lock on a `default` function is a very sparsely used pattern. As such, the impact is low. Version 0.3.0 contains a patch for the issue.

Technologies: [vyper (PyPI)](https://junglewise.ai/threats/technologies/vyper). Vendors: [PyPI](https://junglewise.ai/threats/vendors/pypi).

## Quick answers

**Is CVE-2024-32648 exploited in the wild?** No. Junglewise Threat Intelligence has no report of CVE-2024-32648 being exploited in the wild.

**How severe is CVE-2024-32648?** Low severity, with a CVSS score of 3.1, published 25 April 2024.

**Which products and versions are affected?** vyper (PyPI) ECOSYSTEM:introduced=0,fixed=0.3.0, GIT:introduced=0,fixed=93287e5ac184b53b395c907d40701f721daf8177|ECOSYSTEM:introduced=0,fixed=0.3.0.

**Is there a fix for CVE-2024-32648?** Yes. vyper (PyPI): upgrade to 0.3.0 or later. Junglewise finds every place you run it, drafts the upgrade and applies it once you approve.

**Am I affected by CVE-2024-32648?** Check whether you run vyper (PyPI) at an affected version. Junglewise does that check for you around the clock: connect your code, cloud and domains, and it matches new vulnerabilities like this one against what you actually run and tells you when one reaches you.

## How to fix

- vyper (PyPI): upgrade to 0.3.0 or later

  ```sh
  pip install "vyper>=0.3.0"
  ```


## Affected products

- vyper (PyPI) ECOSYSTEM:introduced=0,fixed=0.3.0, GIT:introduced=0,fixed=93287e5ac184b53b395c907d40701f721daf8177|ECOSYSTEM:introduced=0,fixed=0.3.0

## Identifiers

- CVE-2024-32648
- GHSA-m2v9-w374-5hj9
- PYSEC-2024-163

## Related threats

- [Vyper memory corruption in nested function calls and tuples](https://junglewise.ai/threats/vyper-memory-corruption-using-function-calls-within-tuples-nested-calls-c0689acb)
- [Vyper stack corruption in complex type argument passing](https://junglewise.ai/threats/vyper-call-stack-corruption-when-passing-complex-type-containing-non-3deb0c30)
- [Vyper return statement in nested for loops causes revert](https://junglewise.ai/threats/vyper-return-inside-for-loop-more-than-1-level-deep-ee8a193d)
- [PYSEC-2026-2028 - Vyper's `slice()` may elide side-effects when output length is 0](https://junglewise.ai/threats/cve-2025-47774-vyper-s-slice-may-elide-side-effects-when-output-length-is-0)
- [PYSEC-2026-2029 - Vyper's `concat()` builtin may elide side-effects for zero-length arguments](https://junglewise.ai/threats/cve-2025-47285-vyper-s-concat-builtin-may-elide-side-effects-for-zero-length)
